Simple Default Reasoning in Theories of Action

نویسندگان

  • Hannes Strass
  • Michael Thielscher
چکیده

We extend a recent approach to integrate action formalisms and non-monotonic reasoning. The resulting framework allows an agent employing an action theory as internal world model to make useful default assumptions. While the previous approach only allowed for modeling static defaults, that are independent of state properties, our extension allows for the expression of dynamic defaults. Problems that arise due to the interaction of defaults with the solution of the frame problem are dealt with accordingly: we devise a general method of integrating defaults into the formal representation of action effects and show that the method prevents counter-intuitive conclusions.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Deontic Modals: Why Abandon the Default Approach

John Horty has proposed an approach to reasoning with oughtpropositions which stands in contrast to the standard modal approach to deontic logic. Horty’s approach is based on default theories as known from the framework of Default Logic. It is argued that the approach cannot be extended beyond the most simple kinds of default theories and that it fails in particular to account for conditional o...

متن کامل

Default Reasoning about Actions

Action Theories are versatile and well-studied knowledge representation formalisms for modelling dynamic domains. However, traditional action theories allow only the specification of definite world knowledge, that is, universal rules for which there are no exceptions. When modelling a complex domain for which no complete knowledge can be obtained, axiomatisers face an unpleasant choice: either ...

متن کامل

Compiling Causality into Action Theories

This paper is concerned with the problem of representing the eeects of actions. We argue that the traditional minimal change principle is problematic to represent ramiications of actions that are related to the causality of the domain. To handle this problem properly, it is necessary to describe the causal relations of the domain explicitly and compile the domain causality into action theories....

متن کامل

Default Reasoning with Speci cityPhan

We present a new approach to reasoning with speciicity which subsumes inheritance reasoning. The new approach diiers from other approaches in the literature in the way priority between defaults is handled. Here, it is context sensitive rather than context independent as in other approaches. We show that any context independent handling of priorities between defaults as advocated in the literatu...

متن کامل

Propositional Argumentation Systems vs Theorist

Propositional argumentation systems are based on assumption based reasoning and used for computing arguments which support a given hypotheses Assumption based reasoning is closely related to hypothetical default theories or inference through theory formation The latter approach known as the Theorist frame work has well known relations to abduction and default reasoning In this paper proposition...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2009